Click below to see the exact removal rules. These will often be removed without explanation and are not allowed on days when patch announcements/notes are posted. Memes, image macros, reaction gifs and low quality posts are usually not allowed (put some effort into it at least). Spoilers and NSFW posts must be properly marked.ĭiscussion or links to jailbreaking / hacking / cheating / fraud / piracy / account trading and sharing / e.t.c. Keep it civil - No witch hunting or calling out other users. We hope to see you on the Battlefield! DARK MODE LIGHT MODE Join us on Discord! on Twitter Battlefield Youtube Related SubredditsĭICE Official News Firestorm Discussion Video Question Image/Gif Datamine Fan Content Rumor Megathread AMA Patch notes Current patch (Summer Update) Previous patch notes Subreddit Rules Discuss BFV and share content with other fans. If they are violating the TOS by using hacks, well that is a different case and should be dealt with accordingly./r/BattlefieldV is the #1 place on Reddit for all your Battlefield V news. You don't have the right to dictate to someone else how they can run their persistent server. The TOS clearly allow player run persistent servers with the ability to admin as they see fit. I wouldn't complain about the admins or their rules.Īs far as laws, you are just wrong. I've played on bad private servers that I just wouldnt go back to. I think it was a big mistake to kill private servers in favor of pushing people towards public ones. Right now BF1/5 public servers are the same with hackers. In the BF3/4 days, private servers were the only servers dealing with hackers and the EA public servers were rampant with hackers. Now we are left with only the in-game "report" function, which is a joke. I think one of EAs biggest mistakes was taking away the BF3/4 style private servers with back end access to data. My question is why would you want to play on a server you think has cheaters and hostile admins when there are ample amounts of servers available to play on. Long live Strike on Karkand and Wake Island. I've been playing since BF2 as well and like you its my most played FPS by far. Player name is, If I am not spelling wrong. And without law, there would be nothing left. If such a situation is allowed, the law will have no meaning. I repeat, just because some pay for something does not mean that he can abuse the local permission he has against other fair players. I was kicked and banned from their server, just because he had the paid authority which is not audited and controlled by any other objective third party or EA. We need to remember that just because someone pay to own a server or a service, or a game account does not entitle him to do anything he wants.(Fair usage) There are laws, rules. Very hostile approach, disrespectful tongue, zero manners by the owner or shareholder of the aforementioned server (BITE2042).(Just because he wanted to ban for personal satisfaction) I was banned just because I claimed that there could be cheaters etc. I was playing in the server called BITE2042. I want to see sanctions against players and illegitimate actions. This is unacceptable and very against customers rights, since its affecting their paid services which they buy to have some distract from daily life and spend good times playing fair. But there are not actions taken, no ban. Recently I noticed that There are many players are cheating with some sort of tool apps and, we report them. I can say its only game I mostly played ever since we got the internet connection to our homes. Information, Guides and Announcements for the EA app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |